« Blawging's Dirty Little Secret | Main | Home Cookin' or Incompetent Chef? »

June 09, 2005

More Civil Forfeiture Lunacy

King crab taken in violation of Russian fishing regulations is subject to forfeiture under the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. § 3374(a), on a strict liability basis. The question before us is whether an importer of such crab may assert an 'innocent owner defense' in forfeiture proceedings. Under the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 983, the innocent owner defense cannot be asserted when the property to be forfeited is 'contraband or other property that it is illegal to possess.'" 

U.S. v. Deep Sea Harvester, No. 03-36006 (9th Cir. Jun. 9, 2005).

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/88673/2617549

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More Civil Forfeiture Lunacy:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Counter