« The Kelo decision, or, does property mean anything anymore? | Main | Feeney Amendment and Separation of Powers »

June 23, 2005

The Forgotten Constitution

Two shell games converged in the Supreme Court's Kelo decision: the hoax of sovereign immunity, and the dormant police power. Both threaten to make a mockery of the Bill of Rights and of the liberties we enjoy as Americans.

Kelo holds that a municipality may use its eminent domain power to seize property for private development. Who gave the sovereign the power to take our homes?

Certainly not the founders. We cannot even be required to quarter soldiers in our homes. Warrants are necessary to enter our homes. We are secure in our persons and papers ... Sort of.

What's sovereign immunity have to do with it?

One of the greatest villains in American law is William Blackstone. His Commentaries were the the mother's milk of colonial legal education. Smuggled in with the work was a medieval hold over, sovereign immunity. You know the maxim: What pleases the prince has the force of law.

Our courts have given shape to this doctrine, making government unaccountable to us in many ways.

What of the dormant police power?

The best and most profound constitutional theorizing is typically done at the federal level, interpreting the meaning of a government of limited powers. Where's that leave the states? With seemingly  unlimited power. We say of the federal power that it is limited; the police power, by contrast, is assumed to be unlimited. Why? The common law's secret affair with Blackstone's succubus, sovereign immunity.

Kelo is bad, terrifying law, the sort of law over which a person should think incendiary thoughts. We revolted against Britain over far less.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf6e653ef00d8342394e053ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Forgotten Constitution:

» local schmocal: kelo from f/k/a . . . .
[Read More]

» Crime and Federalism from Windypundit
Here on Windypundit, I rant about civil liberties and legal issues and frightening police behavior. Because of these interests, I end up reading a lot of blogs by criminal defense attorneys. However, I've noticed that these attorneys themselves don't r... [Read More]

Comments

Norm

Here here! I couldn't agree more with everything you said. Bills limiting eminent domain have been gaining popularity in state legislatures, and hopefully this will continue. It's the last line of defense.

In oral arguments, Justice O'Connor asked the lawyer for the government if this meant that any budget motel could be replaced by a fancy hotel and justified as a public purpose. The lawyer answered 'yes.' Now that absurd mutation of our Constitution is the law of the land.

Just an observation on Norm Pattiss's article THE FORGOTTEN CONSTITUTION at Paragraph 2, second sentence; "Who gave the sovereign the power to take our homes?" As I read the Constitution and the documents leading up to its passage, the People are the Sovereign, NOT any unit of government! The Sovereign People are asleep and have forgotten how to say NO!! Governments for government's sake is their thinking and career polititians are the cause while the voting public fail to elect new representative in an effort to curb special interest and corruption.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Counter