Responding to a post by Kathleen A. Bergin (via Olson) - which did not cite sources or other evidence in support of his facts, one commentator wrote a lengthy rebuttal. Ann Bartow allowed the rebuttal to be posted through her censor, but disclaimed: "I’m allowing the comment to post, but caution readers that [the commenter] has not sourced or documented his recitation of 'the facts.'" While the "cauation" is duly noted, I wonder why Bartow would hold her readers to a higher standard than she would hold her blog posters?
Comments