If you could prove that you were not even in the same city the night a crime allegedly occurred, you would probably assume that you would not be considered a suspect. But they do things differently in Durham, as K.C. Johnson reports here.
« New York Times Gunning for Justice Kennedy | Main | The "Duke Effect" And Framing »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf6e653ef00df351fc2f68834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More Jaw-Dropping Facts from the Duke Lacrosse Case:
» More Postmordems for Duke Lacrosse Case from Sex Crimes
Crime Federalism points to a Durham in Wonderland post about the seeming disregard by the prosecution paid to one defendant's exculpatory evidence:Ross also was a key figure in the lacrosse case. He was the only team member that Crystal Mangum [Read More]
» June 14 roundup from Overlawyered
Encouraging kids' adoption is a great thing to do, but there are right and wrong ways of going about it [U.K. Daily Mail] Defensive medical testing: "Every day I work as a doctor, I must... [Read More]
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments