Worst Supreme Court Case?

Paul Gowder wants to know: "What's the most destructive Supreme Court case that's still good law?" 

Comments

[KipEsquire]

Wickard v. Filburn. All federal economic interventionism (not to mention quite a bit of federal criminal interventionism, including Raich) derives directly from it. And its reasoning is unquestionably the just-plain-dumbest consequentialist rationalizing in the history of Supreme Court jurisprudence.

The Ten Worst Supreme Court Cases

[Publius]

I was going to say the same case. Wickard v. Filburn. Seriously, if the government can tell me I can't grow carrots in my backyard because of the negative aggregate effect, where's the limit?

[Greg May]

Wickard v. Filburn ranks right up there, that's for sure.