Randi Harper posts on Twitter and elsewhere online as "FreeBSDGirl." About a month or so ago, Ms. Harper made some false accusations against me. She claimed I was harassing or threatening her. I had never heard of the pretty young lady.
I thus hired a private investigator to begin looking into Randi Harper's alleged criminal background. After all, one must be careful these days and know who they are dealing with. Making false threats against me evidences instability. I have to be able to defend myself vigorously against any and all accusations.
This is becoming a bit of a hassle. However, in this day an age, a woman's false word can get a man sent to prison. A man who is falsely accused of immoral or illegal behavior needs to hire a private investigator or otherwise find out who is lying about him.
According to a website called Encyclopedia Dramatica, Randi Harper (NSFW) has a criminal record.
I decided to look into the allegations against Mr. Harper. Georgia.Arrests.org, a website that posts public arrest records confirms that Randi Harper has been in jail.
(Is this Randi Harper's mug shot? Yes, it is!)
The alleged mug shot seems consistent with mug shots I have seen. In this picture, Ms. Harper is wearing clothing similar to what inmates in jail wear. She also looks very unhappy in the picture. I am still awaiting confirmation.
When I mentioned my investigation into Ms. Harper, bringing up her alleged arrest record, she freaked out.
According to a story appearing in the newspaper The Citizen (here), a "Randi Lee Harper" was arrested in Fayette County, Georgia for failure to appear in court. What was the underlying charge that this "Randi Lee Harper" failed to appear in court to face?
There have been rumors that Ms. Harper has been involved in drug use. I have been unable to confirm those humors, however, and will give Ms. Harper the benefit of the doubt in the meantime.
I was unable to confirm whether that "Randi Lee Harper" mentioned in the story was FreeBSDGirl. Her reaction suggests that indeed it was the same Randi Haper.
Otherwise, why would she have been so upset to learn I am asking questions and looking into her background?
Randi Harper formed an Internet hate mob in an effort to ban me from Twitter.
What did I do to offend Randi Harper? According to her: "He's posting legal information online in an attempt to intimidate and harass people."
Although my intent was not to harass Ms. Harper, I have to wonder if she did not indeed confirm she has an arrest record. Otherwise, why would she be so upset?
My investigation is ongoing. If you have any relevant information or links, please post them in the comments below.
UPDATE: In response to my commentary about her, Randi Harper has falsely accused me of making rape threats against her. This is clearly an unstable woman. Deal with her at your own peril.
Sam Biddle is a writer currently employed by Gawker Media. Sam Biddle was a nobody who rose to fame when he used his platform at Gawker to torment and terrorize people. He is famous for saying, "Bring back bullying."
("Bring Back Bullying." - Sam Biddle.)
Sam Biddle was challenged by lawyer Mike Cernovich to a friendly boxing match. The rules were highly civilized - mouth guards, large padded gloves, and head gear. Mike Cernovich was even willing to put up $10,000 for charity to incentivize Biddle to accept the boxing challenge.
Sam Biddle declined, proving he is only interested in harming those he perceives to be vulnerable.
The link between bullying and animal abuse.
In "Psychological profile of male and female animal abusers," researchers examined the connection between bullying and animal abuse. Their findings revealed:
This study had three purposes: to explore psychological characteristics of animal abusers (criminal thinking styles, empathy, and personality traits), to replicate previously reported results (past illegal actions, bullying behavior), and to examine potential gender differences. The self-reported animal abuser group was 29 college students who reported two or more incidents of animal abuse; controls were 29 college students matched on age and gender. Participants completed self-report measures of criminal thinking, illegal behaviors, bullying, empathy, and the five-factor personality traits. Results indicated animal abusers had more previous criminal behaviors, were more likely to bully, and had the highest scores on the power orientation criminal thinking scale. Abuser by gender interactions were detected; female animal abusers scored significantly higher on several measures of criminal thinking, were found to be more likely to bully, and exhibited lower scores on measures of perspective taking and empathy compared to female controls.
It is possible that Sam Biddle suffered early child abuse, and is as much a victim as a perpetrator. See, Animal abuse among preadolescents directly and indirectly victimized at school and at home. ("Animal abuse by preadolescents has been associated with their later family violence and/or criminal behaviour; less is known about animal abuse and concurrent experience of being a victim at home and/or school, or of contemporaneous aggression to peers.)
See also, Effects of Childhood Adversity on Bullying and Cruelty to Animals in the United States: Findings From a National Sample. ("The final models indicated that the cumulative burden of childhood adversities had strong effects on the increased likelihood of bullying behavior but not cruelty to animals.")
When we look into Sam Biddle, we see a very disturbed man. He may even be a sociopath, as he appears to lack empathy and compassion.
For example, in a lengthy discussion he had on animal abuse, he observed that animals, "have pain receptors, sure. but 'cruelty' exists in the mind of the tormentor, animals can never feel 'torment.'"
Is it true that animals cannot feel torment? Or is Sam Biddle unable to empathize with the animals he potentially tortures? I don't know that Sam Biddle tortures animals. I can only speculate. That said, bullies often commit acts of animal cruelty.
Given Biddle's remark that, "Kicking a dog isn't unethical," one has to ask these tough questions.
Biddle's pro-bullying remarks in addition to his views on animal welfare suggest he lacks empthy, that is, he does not have an ability to feel the pain and suffering other sentient beings endure.
Biddle further noted, "society shuns animal cruelty because it's upsetting and indicative of further psychosis, not because it's 'wrong.'"
He went on to note, "kicking a dog isn't unethical but it's in our interests as socialized beings to not do it."
Would you trust this man to babysit you children or watch your pet?
I wouldn't trust Sam Biddle around any vulnerable person. I wouldn't trust him around a child, an animal, or a girl who had had too much to drink.
Indeed, Sam Biddle's good friend Max Read remarked, "ketamine would be QUITE a 'date-rape drug.'"
(Max Read shares his date rape drug tips with the world.)
People are free to associate with the likes of Sam Biddle, to be sure. I would certainly be careful.
P.S. Ladies, watch those drinks when around Max and Sam!
Liz Pullen is an online activist who describes herself in her Twitter bio as as, "Sociologist, Ethnographer. Vagabond scholar."
Her LinkedIN profile describes her as a "Social Media Analyst, Writer, Editor, Community Manager."
She is also an ableist, that is, someone who mocks the disabled and other persons who experience suffering.
Liz Pullen is part of an online hate mob, let by a graduate student named Margaret Caroline Pless (an aspiring research scientist who is going to work in the medical field), and joined by David Futrelle.
I am a controversial character and understand that people attack my views on the world. That is totally cool. Free speech!
Yet what Liz Pullen, Margaret Caroline Pless, and David Futrelle do is low down.
Together they congregate at a Twitter site designed to mock me.
They do more than mock my past writings and views on the world.
They mock a serious medical condition I suffered from called Red Skin Syndrome.
Liz Pullen seems to think it's fine to mock me, as she follows that Twitter profile. David Futrelle does as well. (I have screen caps proving they follow this account. UPDATE: See screen shots below.)
As you can see, Liz Pullen and her friends have no decency or dignity.
How can these people claim to have any moral high ground or moral supremacy when basic human compassion seems beyond their understanding? How can they call anyone out for anything when they mock those who suffer from medical conditions that are physically and mentally disabling. (Nervous breakdowns are common for Red Skin Syndrome sufferers. I wasn't able to work for 6 weeks, as my sleep was disrupted and even moving hurt.)
They remain free to mock me. I remain free to call them out for their callousness and pitiable spirit.
UPDATE: Some people don't believe that Liz Pullen, Margaret Caroline Pless, and David Futrelle practice what is known as "ableism."
Here are the screen shots proving that they mock me not for my offensive views, but for a serious medical condition.
(Liz Pullen mocks those who suffer from serious medical conditions.)
(David Futrelle discriminates against the disabled.)
Maurice Pilosof, Owen Cook, and Julien Blanc of Real Social Dynamics have real problems.
Maurice Pilosof is a lawyer representing Real Social Dynamics, which is owned by Owen Cook and employes Julien Blanc. RSD has been caught up in a sexaul assault scandal. In a video Julian Blanc filmed for RSD (and that Owen Cook approved), Blanc is seen committing sexual assault on a woman.
(Click play to learn sexual assault tips from Julien Blanc. Owen Cook approved of this video.)
The media has been spanking Owen Cook and Julian Blanc. Rather than respond to the media to share their story, Owen Cook has hidden in a bunker.
Owen is hiding out because he can't keep his story straight.
Owen Cook knew about Julien Blanc's sexual assault video.
Owen Cook wants to censor 8Chan because 8Chan contains screen captures that prove Owen Cook knew about Julien Cook's sexual assault video.
Before the drama went down Owen Cook posted on the Real Social Dynamics web forum:
It's like 100 or 200 people mad on the internet, similar to pick up hate.
The Japan video will have succeeded if it gets in the million view range.
Julien's goal is something closer to what David Bond had, with proper news lol.
(Click on the image for a full screen view.)
Afraid of taking on the media or going on his public relations campaign, Owen Cook has retained a lawyer who may just find himself nominated for censorious asshat of the year.
Maurice Pilosof is attempting to censor websites that are critical of RSD. Mr. Pilosof sent a letter out to the owner of 8chan.co, a message board where users create and share content.
The owner of 8Chan.co has posted the letter on his Twitter feed. The full letter is also reproduced below.
Mr. Pilosof's letter has all of the telltale signs of an attempt to censor. The letter, like all such empty threats from lawyers, throws out a bunch of legalese and mean-sounding threats. These letters are long on generalities and short on specifics.
RSD's letter has one intent only - to censor.
An attorney who understands free speech would laugh at this letter. Yet legal representation is expensive. Attorneys like Maurice Pilosof regularly send out threatening letters knowing that 99% of people will simply take a post down rather than assert their rights.
The owner of 8Chan.com is not like most people. He will defend his rights.
The letter from Mr. Pilosof is a joke for two reasons.
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
The owner of 8Chan.co did not publish the allegedly defamatory material. Therefore the owner is under no obligation to do anything to "correct the record." Nor is the owner of 8Chan.co under an oligation to remove any allegedly defamatory posts.
2. The letter is a rambling mess of nonsense.
I'll explain in bracketed comments why letters like this should be ignored.
The letter from Maurice Pilosof reads:
The undersigned, the attorney of REAL SOCIAL DYNAMICS, INC., (“RSD”) hereby requests that the following posts be taken down:
The statements contained therein are untrue, private [so what?] and defamatory. [Attorney Pilosof does not identify what statements are defamatory.] Such information and statements were made to malicious [you mean maliciously?] injure RSD’s business. [Free speech is often hurtful. That doesn't matter. Julien Blanc is a public figure. This means you must show that any statements were made with actual malice, that is, that the writer knew the statements were false at the time he made them.]
Further, they [define "they"] contain statements that are patently untrue. [Which statements are patently untrue? Identify each and every statement that you claim is patently untrue.]
The notion that some anonymous individual knows the equity structure of RSD a privately held company is ridiculous. [The anonymous individual might be a whistle blower. You don't know who is leaking information about the dangerous sexual predator Julien Blanc and his employer Owen Cook.] The attribution of ownership contained in the post is patently false. [Prove it.] This letter constitutes a demand for immediate takedown of such post. [Your takedown request is DENIED; see video below.]
All references to Japanese law in the post are without foundation and merit. [Identify each and every reference to Japanese law and show why those references are without foundation and merit.] The “anonymous” post is not from an official judicial body of the Japanese government. [Perhaps the statement is protected satire. Be more specific.] RSD can equivocally [do you mean unequivocally?] state that it nor any of its employees have been contacted by any judicial body in Japan. [Why should we trust the word of sexual predators?] In point of fact, neither RSD nor any of its employees are subject of any criminal proceeding. [Not yet, anyway.] The inaccurate and false statements contained are defamatory per se and need to be removed immediately. [I suggest you read this primer on defamation per se.]
I may be reached via email at email@example.com or via phone to +1 310 652 0137. I have a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law. [This is DMCA legalese. Weren't you just talking about defamation per se?] The information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. [This is also DMCA legalese. Get you theory of the case straight, sir. What exactly are you claiming?]
Sincerely, Maurice Pilosof Legal Counsel, Real Social Dynamics firstname.lastname@example.org
(The owner of 8Chan.co responds to Owen Cook's legal threats.)
Mike Cernovich, a lawyer in California, has recently been attacked by several Internet stalkers. Mike Cernovich's home address as well as a street view image of his home was widely distributed to an online hate mob that included writers from Gawker Media who exchanged date-rape drug tips, a neo-Nazi, and a man who may or may not have covered up a rape.
The Internet hate mob combed through Mike Cernovich's Twitter account, which included over 13,500 Twitter postings (called Tweets). Some of Mike Cernovich's Twitter postings made sense in contenxt. Some were tasteless jokes. Other Tweets were examples of "trolling," that is, provoking a response.
However, Mr. Cernovich believes it's important to examine the people who have been attacking him.
Arthur Chu of Jeopardy fame knew about rape, said nothing.
Arthur Chu wrote an article on the Daily Beast about his experience with rape and rapists. In the article, Chu wrote:
But I have known nerdy male stalkers, and, yes, nerdy male rapists. I’ve known situations where I knew something was going on but didn’t say anything—because I didn’t want to stick my neck out, because some vile part of me thought that this kind of thing was normal....
In an interview on CNN, Arthur Chu said he did not report the rape because some part of him believed rape was OK.
(Jeopardy champion Arthur Chu talks about rape in this CNN interview.)
Ian Miles Cheong was (and perhaps still is) a neo-Nazi.
Ian Miles Cheong held horrible racist views. Some of Cheong's quotes include the following:
Hitler is my fucking idol
holocaust isn’t important enough to capitalize, because jews=nothing
Johnny G DeGirolamo a/k/a John DeGirolamo is a Florida attorney who has sued a leading First Amendment lawyer Marc Randazza. (You can see John DeGirolamo's mug shot at the bottom of this post.)
In my view, attorney Johnny G. DeGirolamo has either filed a frivolous lawsuit or he lacks an understanding of the relevant law.
As a client, you must research a potential attorney carefully before hiring him or her. This is especially true when your business, livelihood, or even freedom is on the line. The client must make an informed decision before hiring a lawyer.
Based on my review of the case filings DeGirolamo has filed, I would never hire Attorney DeGirolamo to represent me in traffic court, let alone a criminal court.
It's Veteran's Day. We are supposed to thank a veteran for our freedom. You'll have trouble finding people more respectful of our Armed Forces than I. Yet each year I wonder who is really protecting our freedoms.
Two Marines face what appears to be false criminal charges. These Marines who we should thank for defending our freedom are facing what look to me to be false criminal charges. Their own government is trying to imprison them.
Who will stand next to these Marines? Lawyers.
People in faraway lands aren't taking away my freedom. The greatest threat to my freedom is found within my own borders.
Robert Caruso is a freelance writer. His work has appeared on websites like Business Insider, the Huffington Post, and the Boston Globe. I conducted research on Robert Caruso and learned that he has fantasies of rape and murder.
That is not an exaggeration. Allow me to quote Mr. Caruso directly. Before we do, let's dismiss one of Mr. Caruso's lies.
Mr. Caruso has falsely claimed that these are photoshops or that his Twitter account was hacked. However, I spent several hours archiving his Tweets on Archive.Today, a site that takes a real-time picture of a website or Tweet.
I went through his entire timeline. Robert Caruso's rape-loving Twitter was not hacked.
If called to appear in court, I could and would testify that Mr. Robert Caruso posted the following to his Twitter account:
the Kenyans and Ethiopians can rape and pillage your hometown. I'm at peace with either one.
I am a licensed attorney familiar with the practice of gathering and authenticating evidence. I Archived a copy of all of his Tweets.
Robert Caruso is welcome to sue me. My attorney has asked me to tell Mr. Caruso that we will waive service of process. (That means Mr. Caruso is welcome to email a copy of his complaint directly to my attorney rather than spend the time, money, and effort to serve me in person.)
[This is hypothetical and about no one in particular. Revealing the identify of a federal informant can in some cases be prosecuted as a crime. I would never reveal the identity of an informant. This post is for informational purposes only.]
Imagine you're hungry for attention. Perhaps you didn't get much attention growing up and have serious daddy issue.
The best way to get attention is to convince people your life is in danger. There is nothing quite like a damsel (or dashing man, as this post could apply to men or women) in distress.
You grew up in a SJW culture where words have no meaning. If someone posts something you don't like, they are stalking you.
If someone writes about you and you go to that person's Twitter page to read it (because he doesn't reach out to you), he's harassing you. Forget that this "harasser" never wrote anything to you or even contacted you. Words mean whatever your crybaby gender studies course says they mean.
You grow up in a culture without consequences. Thus, you think nothing of sending yourself a few death threats.
The media and everyone else takes the bait. You're a big star who is finally getting that attention you so richly craved.
Enter the Feds.
Then the Feds come knocking. You foolishly believe that talking to an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigations is like talking to a gender studies professor. Tell them what you feel and they will blindly accept it. Feels > Law.
Since words have no meaning, you tell these agents you were threatened. (Hey, maybe you or a friend of yours sent the email. But words mean whatever you want them to. You did feel threatened by that fake email, after all, right?)
As it turns out, the Feds don't like being lied to. Lying to a federal agent is a federal crime, in fact. It's called obstruction of justice and it's a felony.
Snitches get hugs and kisses.
The Feds know that prosecutions are political. If you've been given the royal treatment by the media, perhaps the Feds might not want to prosecute you. Like other government agencies, the Feds are sensitive to public relations.
Some tight-asses (no one has tighter buttholes than Federal agents; do not ever lie to these people or even talk to them unless you have an attorney present) say to you:
"Hey, you're a felon. You have a choice - go to prison or be a confidential informant."
The Feds give you an idea. Go find some white knights to help you run Ops. Hack a few sites. You know, the usual.
This is nothing to you. You're an SJW and you don't care about anyone but yourself.
You enlist some hapless white knights to help you.
You avoid prison time and now the FBI has a whole bunch of people they can indict for violations of computer crime statutes. (Or the Feds can turn these white knights into snitches.)